Am I “Being Good” or am I not Being at All?
A lot of my clients struggle with the pressure of being a good person. While the specifics of their version of ‘good’ varies, the impulse is the same. It’s the move toward self-erasure before the body has had a chance to register its own needs.
Goodness is inherently relational; it’s about how we appear in the eyes of others, which we have internalized as our own self-view. In this way, goodness is always about how we impact others, and usually in the negative. That is, being good is not upsetting, disappointing them, or otherwise inconveniencing those around us. Of course, any negative definition of self is inherently about our absence, and thus, about self-erasure. If the most "good" version of us is the one that demands the least, then the perfectly good version of us is the one that doesn't exist at all. Unfortunately, our internal world will always be a “inconvenience” in a relational world in which we are valued for what we offer and not by what we experience.
For many of my clients, goodness is not a conscious choice; it is lived. Asking ‘how is this affecting me?’ isn’t a question that even appears. There's a sense of betrayal for even asking it.
When we live our lives this way, accommodation becomes unthought, unfelt, and just embodied. Our nervous system learns to inhibit spontaneous impulse, reduce friction, and signal safety to others. These patterns have been discussed clinically in several frameworks:
As appeasement: a functional survival response in complex trauma, often confused with fawning (Walker, 2013)
As dorsal vagal shutdown: a freeze/collapse state within the autonomic nervous system described in Polyvagal Theory (Porges, 2011)
As role-confused attachment: in which children become emotional regulators of dysregulated caregivers (Lyons-Ruth & Jacobvitz, 2008)
What links these patterns is that preserving relationships becomes more important than preserving our authenticity, and avoiding conflict becomes more important than self-expression.
It’s extremely difficult for us to change such an oppressive sense of needing to be "moral” or “good.” Cognitive insight often only intensifies shame. We may already know we override ourselves, but we struggle to feel anything from the inside. Our work then is not about encouraging expression at first, but instead about slowing down enough to build tolerance for our internal signals. Somatic pacing is critical. So is the clinician’s tracking of any reflex to “offer” insight inside the therapy relationship itself, in real time.
For those of us with inherited stories of always “being a good…” partner, daughter, son, father, student, employee, or otherwise, it can be freeing to know that the one way we can most authentically care for someone else is not be appeasing them, but by showing up coherently. Coherence is simultaneously the most dependable and exciting thing we can offer. This is not selfishness at all. Instead, it’s the only thing that allows us to feel a sense of closeness at all.